Building consensus in research partnerships: a scoping review of consensus methods

Background: Research partnership approaches that engage community members within the research team (for example, integrated knowledge translation, community-based participatory research) are typically used to enhance relevance and usefulness of findings. However, outcomes generated through partnered do not de facto address priorities those most affected nor take inclusion or power dynamics into consideration. Consensus methods Delphi, Deliberative Dialogue) can be develop evidence-based solutions by addressing groups’ needs priorities. Limited has examined how consensus partnerships. Aims objectives: Using PRISMA-ScR checklist as a guide, this scoping review sought better understand use in Methods: The search strategy involved four databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE CINAHL Plus). A total 6,654 citations were screened, 404 advanced for full text review, 34 studies met eligibility criteria. Data from extracted iteratively analysed three our team. Findings: At least 11 different with variations Delphi being common. Issues rarely discussed. Overall, there was limited reporting methods, approaches, and/or dynamics. Discussion conclusions: This extends literature providing an overview have been conducted partnerships they executed. We offer initial considerations conducting on co-production.